DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSING ENDOMETRIAL POLYP TAKING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65035/t7vfe916Keywords:
Transvaginal ultrasound, Endometrial polyp, Abnormal uterine bleeding, Histopathology, Diagnostic accuracy.Abstract
Background: Endometrial polyps are a frequent cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women of reproductive and perimenopausal age. Accurate, noninvasive diagnosis is essential for appropriate management. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is widely used for evaluating endometrial pathology, but its diagnostic accuracy varies across studies.
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting endometrial polyps, using histopathology as the gold standard.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Lahore General Hospital / PGMI, Lahore, and included 112 women aged 22–45 years presenting with AUB. All underwent TVS followed by histopathological evaluation of endometrial tissue obtained by biopsy or hysteroscopy. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated using histopathology as the reference standard.
Results: Endometrial polyps were confirmed on histopathology in 16 (14.3%) patients. TVS identified polyps in 58 (51.8%) cases. The diagnostic performance of TVS was: sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 51.0%, PPV 19.0%, NPV 90.7%, and overall accuracy 53.6%. The high NPV indicated good reliability of TVS in ruling out endometrial polyps, whereas the low PPV reflected over-diagnosis due to overlapping sonographic features with other endometrial conditions.
Conclusion: Transvaginal ultrasound is a useful, noninvasive, and readily available screening tool for detecting endometrial polyps in women with AUB. A negative TVS reliably excludes polyps; however, positive findings should be confirmed by hysteroscopy and histopathology before therapeutic intervention.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Aaima Bakhtawar, Dr. Nadia Hanif, Dr. Sumaira Yousaf, Dr. Fatima Iqbal, Dr. Muneeb Ahmad, Dr. Samia Pervaiz (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review (JMHSR) remain the copyright of their respective authors. JMHSR publishes its content under the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY‑NC 4.0), which allows readers to freely share, copy, adapt, and build upon the work for non‑commercial purposes, provided proper credit is given to both the authors and the journal.



