EXPLORING THE BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO HPV VACCINE PROMOTION AMONG SCHOOL NURSES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Shamshad Kousar Chaudhary Isra University, Islamabad Author
  • Samia Haroon MSN Shifa tameer e millat university, Islamabad Author
  • Muhammad Majid Kanwar University of Health Sciences, Lahore Author
  • Dua Zhaira Riphah International University, Rawalpindi Author
  • Maryam Khalid Isra University, Islamabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65035/r3k7k778

Keywords:

Human Papilloma Virus, Vaccination, Qualitative methods, professional training

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is an essential public health tool in reducing the incidence of HPV-related cancers, particularly cervical cancer. Despite the proven benefits of the vaccine, vaccination rates among adolescents remain suboptimal globally. School nurses are key figures in promoting vaccination within schools, yet their efforts are hindered by various barriers such as parental resistance, misinformation, lack of training, and limited resources. This qualitative study examines school nurses' experiences with HPV vaccine promotion, identifying both barriers and facilitators to vaccine advocacy. Semi-structured interviews with 15 school nurses from diverse educational settings reveal key challenges including misinformation, time constraints, and parental objections. Facilitators such as professional training, institutional policies, and collaborative efforts with healthcare providers were also identified. The study underscores the importance of systemic interventions to enhance school nurses' capacity to advocate for the HPV vaccine effectively. Recommendations are provided to improve training, policy support, and public health collaboration to increase HPV vaccination uptake.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

EXPLORING THE BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO HPV VACCINE PROMOTION AMONG SCHOOL NURSES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. (2026). Journal of Medical & Health Sciences Review, 3(1), 221-226. https://doi.org/10.65035/r3k7k778